Risultati ricerca

Further comment has appeared on the England and Wales Family Court's decision to pierce the corporate veil in the financial remedy case of Akhmedova v Akhmedov (2018 EWFC 23 Fam). The judge considered it necessary to go against the long-standing legal principle, in response to Farkhad Akhmedov's 'continuing campaign to defeat his ex-wife by concealing his assets in a web of offshore companies', and issued orders to aid her enforcement of the judgment in the Isle of Man and Dubai FATTO

Currency repatriation requirements were extended on 14 April to cover loans issued by Russian residents to foreign borrowers, reducing the opportunities for businesses to shift funds abroad through non-repayable loans.

La principale obligation de l’acheteur est bien entendu celle de payer au vendeur le prix convenu au moment de la signature du contrat d’achat. Au cas où une certaine somme aurait été versée auparavant sous forme d’acompte ou d’arrhes, il devra évidemment payer la différence, c’est à dire le solde du prix. Il est admis que l’acheteur demande un échelonnement du paiement, mais il ne peut pas faire valoir le droit de l’obtenir du vendeur, puisqu’un tel accord dépend du pouvoir discrétionna